Peer Review Policy
CMCCR uses independent peer review to assess clinical validity, originality and suitability for publication. The review model in use (such as double-anonymous review) is set by journal administration and may be described to authors during the review process.
Principles
- Timely, constructive and confidential evaluation
- Independence from commercial or personal conflicts
- Fair treatment of author responses and appeals
- Protection of reviewer identity when anonymous review is active
Editorial workflow
- 1
Submission
- 2
Technical Check
- 3
Editorial Screening
- 4
Reviewer Assignment
- 5
Peer Review
- 6
Editorial Decision
- 7
Revision
- 8
Final Decision
- 9
Production
- 10
Publication
Authors: see peer review for authors. Reviewers: see for reviewers.